a  

     
 
 

I was unhappy about the reflex sight that came with the PS90 weapon. I was also unhappy about the bore to sight height (4") and the incapability of the weapon to accommodate other optics. I floated some ides on the fivesevenforum for which I was banned - because according to them, the PS90 is perfect. So I assumed an alias and broached the subject with extreme trepidation. It took all 3 posts to get me banned again for even suggesting that the PS90 was somehow faulty and that I wanted to "cut" into perfection. Why, they laughed, they told me that I would break my PS90 into thousand pieces taking the barrel off alone and they would buy my parts on ebay.

Hence, this site, this forum and Project X was born. I was tired of arguing with juvenile forum admins that did not shoot or owned the PS90 carbine. This rifle is not perfect, far from it. This item should not cost more than the Beretta Storm. FN saw a niche and they charge what the market will bare. I fail to see why the civilian version costs 50% more than the Class III version of the same. I still got one. Like you, I saw great potential in  this platform and an undeniable "cool factor" soon to be banned. My thought was - better get one now.

Weapon is only as good as its sighting system. If you can't aim at what you are trying to hit then it's only a $1,700 paper weight. So let's deal with that first. I had some prototypes of how to accomplish this.

Prototype 1:
Cut the top off and weld on a 1918 rail

This was a good idea. But I wanted this process to be easily accomplished and inexpensive. I also wanted to keep the receiver as original as possible in case FN came out with a descent reflex.

NEXT